Citadel Agentic LabsRESEARCH Pakistan governance

Pakistan / Administrative-unit atlas

Explore all 34 proposed units.

Census profiles for a draft service geography. Each of 136 reporting districts is assigned once; current legal boundaries and elected-council membership still require verification.

Choose what the map shows

Population · Census 2023
Explore 34 proposed administrative unitsSelect a numbered unit to read its 2023 census profile. Draft boundaries use legacyOCHA geometry. Keamari coverage needs reconciliation. Grey areas are outside the demographic scope. This is not enacted delimitation.01020304050607080910111516171819202122232425262728293031323334KARACHI INSET · NOT TO SCALE121314Draft service areas · Source geometry 2022 · Census 2023
870,00022,772,710

Continuous linear scale · Dark outline marks the selected unit.

Every unit, in one table.

Counts are from Census 2023. Age, literacy and household measures use the detailed-information universe, which can be smaller than headline population.

UnitTerritoryPopulationUrbanFemaleUnder 15Literacy 10+Female literacy 10+HouseholdsDetailed coverageDistricts
01 BahawalpurPunjab13,400,00929.4%48.4%41.3%52.1%45.0%2,060,01399.8%Bahawalnagar, Bahawalpur, Rahim Yar Khan
02 Dera Ghazi KhanPunjab12,892,46521.5%49.2%45.5%48.0%39.2%1,955,04199.5%Dera Ghazi Khan, Layyah, Muzaffargarh, Rajanpur
03 FaisalabadPunjab16,228,52638.5%48.2%36.5%68.8%62.6%2,527,95099.9%Chiniot, Faisalabad, Jhang, Toba Tek Singh
04 GujranwalaPunjab13,730,00743.2%49.2%37.4%76.0%73.6%2,000,01899.7%Gujranwala, Hafizabad, Narowal, Sialkot
05 Gujrat–Mandi BahauddinPunjab5,048,86133.1%50.0%34.3%77.4%73.6%775,75799.9%Gujrat, Mandi Bahauddin
06 LahorePunjab22,772,71070.8%47.8%37.2%73.6%70.3%3,498,99199.9%Kasur, Lahore, Nankana Sahib, Sheikhupura
07 MultanPunjab14,085,10230.7%48.9%38.8%59.4%51.9%2,281,31799.8%Khanewal, Lodhran, Multan, Vehari
08 RawalpindiPunjab11,406,49650.9%49.4%33.0%79.6%73.1%1,871,80699.0%Attock, Chakwal, Jhelum, Rawalpindi
09 SahiwalPunjab8,533,47128.3%49.2%39.1%61.0%54.2%1,341,58899.8%Okara, Pakpattan, Sahiwal
10 SargodhaPunjab9,591,27528.6%48.9%37.3%63.2%52.6%1,543,42199.9%Bhakkar, Khushab, Mianwali, Sargodha
11 HyderabadSindh11,659,24637.3%48.3%42.4%45.4%37.5%2,246,096100.0%Badin, Dadu, Hyderabad, Jamshoro, Matiari, Sujawal, Tando Allahyar, Tando Muhammad Khan, Thatta
12 Karachi Central–EastSindh7,744,067100.0%47.0%34.7%81.8%80.9%1,318,22899.9%Karachi Central, Karachi East
13 Karachi Harbour–WestSindh7,077,59596.5%46.9%35.7%69.7%66.3%1,210,976100.0%Karachi South, Karachi West, Keamari
14 Karachi Malir–KorangiSindh5,561,21977.2%47.1%37.9%72.6%69.4%910,01699.8%Korangi, Malir
15 LarkanaSindh7,093,70630.6%48.6%48.6%44.5%34.6%1,208,563100.0%Jacobabad, Kambar Shahdad Kot, Kashmore, Larkana, Shikarpur
16 Mirpur KhasSindh4,619,62419.4%47.7%48.0%40.4%28.2%863,467100.0%Mirpur Khas, Tharparkar, Umer Kot
17 Shaheed BenazirabadSindh5,930,64929.3%49.2%44.2%49.9%39.6%1,061,799100.0%Naushahro Feroze, Sanghar, Shaheed Benazirabad
18 SukkurSindh6,010,04133.9%48.3%45.2%49.7%37.0%1,052,47599.6%Ghotki, Khairpur, Sukkur
19 BannuKhyber Pakhtunkhwa3,092,0785.0%48.6%46.5%42.1%24.3%414,76599.7%Bannu, Lakki Marwat, North Waziristan
20 Dera Ismail KhanKhyber Pakhtunkhwa3,188,77913.3%47.9%45.0%41.7%28.5%519,54899.8%Dera Ismail Khan, South Waziristan, Tank
21 HazaraKhyber Pakhtunkhwa6,188,73610.3%49.4%41.3%61.0%50.3%1,003,68697.4%Abbottabad, Batagram, Haripur, Kolai Palas Kohistan, Lower Kohistan, Mansehra, Torghar, Upper Kohistan
22 KohatKhyber Pakhtunkhwa3,752,43612.5%48.8%43.3%50.9%32.5%473,60699.9%Hangu, Karak, Kohat, Kurram, Orakzai
23 MalakandKhyber Pakhtunkhwa9,959,39910.2%49.5%45.4%47.5%33.4%1,345,24399.9%Bajaur, Buner, Lower Chitral, Lower Dir, Malakand, Shangla, Swat, Upper Chitral, Upper Dir
24 MardanKhyber Pakhtunkhwa4,639,49817.1%49.0%40.7%56.9%43.4%679,93999.8%Mardan, Swabi
25 PeshawarKhyber Pakhtunkhwa10,035,17126.3%48.7%42.7%51.3%37.7%1,446,22099.9%Charsadda, Khyber, Mohmand, Nowshera, Peshawar
26 KalatBalochistan2,721,01831.7%47.6%49.6%38.7%29.7%433,209100.0%Awaran, Kalat, Khuzdar, Lasbela, Mastung, Surab
27 LoralaiBalochistan870,00011.4%47.5%51.5%39.9%28.9%135,67999.6%Barkhan, Duki, Loralai, Musakhel
28 MekranBalochistan1,875,87237.5%47.5%42.1%47.7%41.7%421,05999.9%Gwadar, Kech, Panjgur
29 NasirabadBalochistan2,044,02119.1%48.7%52.8%32.6%24.1%283,860100.0%Jaffarabad, Jhal Magsi, Kachhi, Nasirabad, Sohbatpur
30 QuettaBalochistan4,259,16346.4%48.4%47.7%51.7%41.1%565,18192.4%Chaman, Killa Abdullah, Pishin, Quetta
31 RakhshanBalochistan1,040,00118.3%47.0%53.2%36.8%27.2%154,46199.9%Chagai, Kharan, Nushki, Washuk
32 SibiBalochistan1,156,74824.2%47.3%53.5%34.7%25.9%171,016100.0%Dera Bugti, Harnai, Kohlu, Sibi, Ziarat
33 ZhobBalochistan927,57912.0%46.5%55.8%32.3%21.9%154,054100.0%Killa Saifullah, Sherani, Zhob
34 IslamabadIslamabad (proposed province)2,363,86346.9%47.2%32.3%84.0%79.1%411,51896.6%Islamabad

PBS Tables 1,5,12,21. Rates are recomputed from summed counts and matching denominators, never by averaging district percentages. [96] Read the method.

Newer surveys give provincial context.

HIES 2024–25 is newer than the census, but its provincial estimates cannot be copied into each proposed administrative unit. Internet is a household-access measure. Municipal garbage collection is one provider category, not total collection by all providers.

ProvinceLiteracy 10+Female literacy 10+Rural female literacy 10+Household internetRural household internetMunicipal garbage collection
Punjab68%62%54%69%60%12%
Sindh58%47%24%67%47%16%
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa58%43%41%77%75%6%
Balochistan49%31%25%69%64%1%

HIES Social Report: printed p 61 education Table 7; p 95 ICT Table 1; p 259 WASH Table 7. No Islamabad estimate is inferred. [85] LFS 2024–25 is stored, but no unit-level unemployment estimate is manufactured. [86]

How the 34-unit draft was assembled

The 2023 census reporting hierarchy contains 9 Punjab divisions, 6 Sindh, 7 KP, 8 Balochistan and one Islamabad case, 31 in total. Separating Gujrat–Mandi Bahauddin from the census Gujranwala division adds one; splitting Karachi into three catchments adds two. This is an analytical choice, not a claim about the current number of notified divisions.

The map uses a legacy district crosswalk. It does not allocate people by polygon area. Keamari is included in the population schedule, but its separate geometry is absent. The exported unions were independently recomputed and checked; that validates the transformation, not current legal geography or boundary suitability.